Putting AI Skills on Your CV Honestly
Share
Everyone now claims AI skills. The claim carries almost no information, which means the way you phrase it is doing all the work.
Direct answer
Put a named task, a measured result and one judgement call. Three specific lines beat a skills list every time, because a skills list cannot be interrogated and specifics can.
Based on the AI and Automation Practitioner standard (ST1512), a Level 4 apprenticeship for people already in work. Funding rules described here are the England position and are set by the funding body.
Potentially free for you
The learner never pays. Employers potentially pay nothing either, and where the apprentice is aged 16 to 24 the government funds the whole cost even if the employer does not pay the levy.
Closing any gap. A levy transfer from another employer covers 100% of the cost. Unused transfer allowance is not carried forward at the end of the tax year, and it must be agreed before the apprentice starts.
From 1 August 2026 the government stopped adding the 10% top-up to new funds entering levy accounts, so there is less in the system than there was.
Part of our guide to AI Careers in the UK Without a Degree.
What recruiters have learned to discount
AI skills as a bullet in a skills list. It appears on almost every CV now and carries no information.
Tool names with no context. Listing four assistants tells a reader you have accounts, not that you did anything.
Proficient in prompt engineering. This phrase specifically has become a signal of the opposite in several sectors.
Any claim without a number attached, in a field where the whole point is measurable time saved.
The three lines that work
The task and the number. Reduced first-response drafting from 12 to 4 minutes across roughly 40 cases a week.
The thing you built. Built a shared prompt library for claims correspondence, adopted by a team of nine.
The judgement call. Recommended against automating exception handling after testing showed a 30% error rate on complex cases.
The third one is the differentiator. Almost nobody includes it and it is what an experienced interviewer is listening for.
Where it belongs on the page
Inside the relevant role, as an achievement, not in a separate skills section at the bottom.
The skills section can name the tools briefly. It should not carry the claim.
If it is genuinely central to what you now do, it belongs in the opening summary with the number attached.
Do not create a separate AI section. It reads as bolted on, which is usually exactly what it is.
There is more on this in our guide to AI careers in the UK.
Language to avoid
Spearheaded, leveraged, championed, drove. These read as generated regardless of whether they were.
Any adjective about the technology rather than the outcome. Words like innovative and transformative describe the tool, not you.
Claiming a job title you do not hold. Prompt engineer on a CV of someone who is not one is checked in four seconds.
Anything you would not say out loud in an interview. That test catches most of it.
Preparing for the questions it invites
What did you actually do. Have the specifics, including which tool and how long it took to get working.
What went wrong. Have a real answer. Candidates with no failures are read as candidates with no experience.
What did you decide not to automate. This is the question that separates people and most candidates have not thought about it.
How did you check the output. Anyone who has used these tools seriously has a checking habit, and it is easy to tell.
UK CV conventions
Two pages is the norm outside academia. Generated CVs run long and length is the commonest formatting problem to fix.
No photograph, no date of birth, no marital status. Generated templates sometimes include them and it reads as inexperienced here.
Public sector applications often score against a published competency framework. Use the framework's own words for things you have actually done.
Name qualifications by their UK level. A recruiter reads Level 4 immediately and a vendor certificate name needs explaining.
If you have nothing to put yet
You are about a month away from having something, and it needs nobody's permission.
Pick one recurring task, time ten instances, improve it, time ten more, write down what you found.
That produces all three lines above from a standing start.
A formal qualification assessed on that work turns it into evidence someone independent has examined.
Key takeaways
- A skills list cannot be interrogated. Specifics can, which is why they work.
- Name the task, the number and one judgement call.
- Put it inside the role as an achievement, not in a separate section.
- Never claim a job title you do not hold.
- Have a real answer for what went wrong.
Frequently asked questions
How do I put AI skills on my CV?
As achievements inside the relevant role. A named task with a number, something you built, and one judgement call about what you did not automate.
Should I list AI tools I use?
Briefly, in the skills section. The tools should not carry the claim, because having accounts is not evidence of anything.
What phrases should I avoid?
AI skills as a bare bullet, proficient in prompt engineering, and any achievement verb with no number attached.
Where on the CV should it go?
Inside the role where you did it. A separate AI section reads as bolted on, which is usually what it is.
What will I be asked in the interview?
What you actually did, what went wrong, what you chose not to automate, and how you checked the output.
What if I have nothing to put yet?
You are about a month away. Pick one recurring task, time ten instances, improve it, and time ten more.
Can I say prompt engineer?
Not unless you hold the title. It is checked in seconds and overclaiming costs you more than the line gains.
What is the strongest single line?
The judgement call. Recommending against automating something, with the testing that supported it, is what an experienced interviewer listens for.
The funded route, in figures
Figures are the England position. Levy-paying employers usually draw the whole cost from the levy they already contribute, so they pay nothing extra. Employers below the £3 million pay bill threshold pay nothing for an apprentice aged 16 to 24. For an older apprentice the government funds 95 per cent, and a levy transfer from a larger employer can cover the rest. Eligibility and funding rules are set by the funding body and can change.
Where to go next
If you want that evidence examined by someone independent, a funded qualification does exactly that using your own work.
We help UK employers and employees access government-funded AI training. Training is delivered by third-party providers. We do not guarantee a place, a qualification, a job or any particular outcome. Eligibility and funding rules are set by the funding body and can change. Always check the current position before you commit. See our disclaimer.